« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 29 30 [31] 32 33 ... 41   Go Down

Author Topic: CryTek v CIG/RSI  (Read 305320 times)

jgajek

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 20
Re: CryTek v CIG/RSI
« Reply #450 on: December 14, 2018, 08:07:51 PM »
Quote
Also, I just checked his latest video. Nope, no change or correction.

Check again.

Quote
It's hilarious that you think breach of contact and copyright infringement claims are a "nuisance". You should try telling that to all the companies and individuals who have been sued into the ground over one or both of those.

What's hilarious about it?  Squadron 42 is not a product that's been delivered to customers.  Showing a snippet of code in Bugsmashers doesn't damage Crytek in any way.  There's nothing here worth litigating anymore.
Logged

dsmart

  • Supreme Cmdr
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4915
    • Smart Speak Blog
Re: CryTek v CIG/RSI
« Reply #451 on: December 15, 2018, 05:27:02 AM »
Quote from: jgajek on December 14, 2018, 08:07:51 PM
What's hilarious about it?  Squadron 42 is not a product that's been delivered to customers.  Showing a snippet of code in Bugsmashers doesn't damage Crytek in any way.  There's nothing here worth litigating anymore.

Ah, I see you've now switched gears and now parroting the new bs from Lior's walkback video. :emot-lol:
Logged
Star Citizen isn't a game. It's a TV show about a bunch of characters making a game. It's basically "This is Spinal Tap" - except people think the band is real.

Motto

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1023
Re: CryTek v CIG/RSI
« Reply #452 on: December 15, 2018, 06:22:21 AM »
Chris probably is trying really hard to get CIG to collapse before the lawsuit continues. Discovery will kill them all.
Logged

jgajek

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 20
Re: CryTek v CIG/RSI
« Reply #453 on: December 15, 2018, 10:14:50 AM »
Quote
Ah, I see you've now switched gears and now parroting the new bs from Lior's walkback video. :emot-lol:

There's something magical about there being only one version of the truth, isn't there?  :rolleyes:

I normally would continue ignoring non-arguments like these, but you haven't posted anything of substance on the actual surviving claims yet.  And referring to abstract "breach of contract" or "copyright infringement" doesn't count.  This is not a boogeyman to scare the kids with.  This is a specific case with its own specific circumstances.

For example, you've told everyone here about how statutory damages is something CIG should be worried about.  Perhaps you can expand on that further.

Logged

Motto

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1023
Re: CryTek v CIG/RSI
« Reply #454 on: December 15, 2018, 10:36:01 AM »
Perhaps you can move your trolling and stupidity to another forum?
Logged

Slapmeandcallmegurl

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 169
Re: CryTek v CIG/RSI
« Reply #455 on: December 15, 2018, 02:40:37 PM »
Quote from: Motto on December 15, 2018, 10:36:01 AM
Perhaps you can move your trolling and stupidity to another forum?

There's this kettle right, and it's black, but somehow it doesn't realise it.

Fascinating stuff.
Logged

Motto

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1023
Re: CryTek v CIG/RSI
« Reply #456 on: December 15, 2018, 02:58:18 PM »
Perhaps you can move your trolling and stupidity to another forum too?
Logged

dsmart

  • Supreme Cmdr
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4915
    • Smart Speak Blog
Re: CryTek v CIG/RSI
« Reply #457 on: December 22, 2018, 07:41:54 AM »
Crytek asks for additional time to file a response to the latest MtD
Logged
Star Citizen isn't a game. It's a TV show about a bunch of characters making a game. It's basically "This is Spinal Tap" - except people think the band is real.

N0mad

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 597
Re: CryTek v CIG/RSI
« Reply #458 on: December 22, 2018, 11:35:28 AM »
Quote from: dsmart on December 22, 2018, 07:41:54 AM
Crytek asks for additional time to file a response to the latest MtD

Is this a delaying tactic to try and delay discovery perhaps?

If so, I can't see the judge being impressed.
Logged

Motto

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1023
Re: CryTek v CIG/RSI
« Reply #459 on: December 22, 2018, 01:18:58 PM »
Since Crytek is the one asking, I guess not. Most likely reason for asking: Holiday season?
Logged

N0mad

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 597
Re: CryTek v CIG/RSI
« Reply #460 on: December 22, 2018, 03:39:15 PM »
LOL, guess I shouldn't post when drunk.
Logged

Backer42

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 196
  • Refundian
Re: CryTek v CIG/RSI
« Reply #461 on: December 22, 2018, 06:43:53 PM »
Quote from: N0mad on December 22, 2018, 11:35:28 AM
Is this a delaying tactic to try and delay discovery perhaps?
Every good show ends the season on a cliffhanger. It keeps the tension up.

Tune in next year, when the underdog comes back in full force. ;)
Logged

dsmart

  • Supreme Cmdr
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4915
    • Smart Speak Blog
Re: CryTek v CIG/RSI
« Reply #462 on: December 25, 2018, 06:23:47 AM »
My coverage of the latest Crytek filing

https://twitter.com/dsmart/status/1077210969984696320
Logged
Star Citizen isn't a game. It's a TV show about a bunch of characters making a game. It's basically "This is Spinal Tap" - except people think the band is real.

BigM

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 24
Re: CryTek v CIG/RSI
« Reply #463 on: December 26, 2018, 05:24:58 PM »
  Was wondering when they do discovery if CryTek will be able to look at all of their personal bank accounts and go after any money in those accounts? 
Logged

StanTheMan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 676
Re: CryTek v CIG/RSI
« Reply #464 on: December 26, 2018, 08:43:11 PM »
Quote from: BigM on December 26, 2018, 05:24:58 PM
  Was wondering when they do discovery if CryTek will be able to look at all of their personal bank accounts and go after any money in those accounts?

Doubt it.

Discovery relates to the specific causes of action in the case in question.   
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 29 30 [31] 32 33 ... 41   Go Up
« previous next »
 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk