Today's funnies...

Keep in mind, Benfords law isn't actually a law. Many distributions won't adhere to it and will still be real data.

wikipedia:

---

Criteria for distributions expected and not expected to obey Benford's law

A number of criteria – applicable particularly to accounting data – have been suggested where Benford's law can be expected to apply and not to apply.[55]

Distributions that can be expected to obey Benford's law

When the mean is greater than the median and the skew is positive

Numbers that result from mathematical combination of numbers: e.g. quantity × price

Transaction level data: e.g. disbursements, sales

Distributions that would not be expected to obey Benford's law

Where numbers are assigned sequentially: e.g. check numbers, invoice numbers

Where numbers are influenced by human thought: e.g. prices set by psychological thresholds ($1.99)

Accounts with a large number of firm-specific numbers: e.g. accounts set up to record $100 refunds

Accounts with a built-in minimum or maximum

---

So while this is a first nice start to question said numbers, it's saddly not enough to actually claim that the provided data is true/false.