Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
Star Citizen / Re: CryTek v RSI/CIG
« Last post by dsmart on Today at 05:28:14 AM »
Seriously, I would have thought CIG would wait as long as possible to delay the inevitable...

They filed this response pretty quickly because seeing as the Rule 26(f) issue is still pending (since April when they filed a protective order to hold it off until the MtD), they didn't want to risk the judge ruling on that, while they're pissing around with their 20 day period to file a response to Crytek's latest. It's almost as if something has them spooked.
2
Star Citizen / Re: Star Citizen Dev Progress Watch
« Last post by Darklegend1 on Today at 05:23:52 AM »
LOL !

Once again CIG have moved (or re-moved) the goalposts. All the new gameplay promised for this year has been replaced with improvements to current systems. The salvage mechanic has survived but been moved into a single feature for next year. Repair and refuel has been reduced in scope to just "manual repair" and "ship to ship refuel" for next year. All other gameplay (and to be honest there wasn't much to get excited about) has been CULLED.



And the carrot moved further again...well lets see if the donkey(zealots) notices!!

Though this is how game development works... :laugh: :laugh:

3.7.0??? :laugh: :laugh:

when responding to posts with images and/or videos, please don't quote them - dsmart
3
Star Citizen / Re: CryTek v RSI/CIG
« Last post by dexatron on Today at 05:22:51 AM »
Seriously, I would have thought CIG would wait as long as possible to delay the inevitable...
4
Star Citizen / Re: CryTek v RSI/CIG
« Last post by dsmart on Today at 05:19:43 AM »
CIG, not waiting for their 20 day period, have immediately filed a response to Crytek.

Not sure why they're so afraid of discovery. It's weird. Almost as if they're trying to hide something.  :emot-iiam:
5
Star Citizen / Re: Star Citizen Media Musings
« Last post by dsmart on Today at 05:15:17 AM »
I guess the boys at cgmagazine didn't get the news yet...

He's way off the mark. I just updated my post above with my comments on his article (sloppy work)
6
Star Citizen / Re: Star Citizen Dev Progress Watch
« Last post by dsmart on Today at 05:10:09 AM »
LOL !

Once again CIG have moved (or re-moved) the goalposts. All the new gameplay promised for this year has been replaced with improvements to current systems. The salvage mechanic has survived but been moved into a single feature for next year. Repair and refuel has been reduced in scope to just "manual repair" and "ship to ship refuel" for next year. All other gameplay (and to be honest there wasn't much to get excited about) has been CULLED.

Just to remind you of the original gameplay promises for 3.2:

I'm fully expecting all the core tech improvements to be kicked into the long grass as well.

I can't wait to see where they put Hurston in the PU - my guess will be that it's effectively behind a loading screen and on a different server.

I am so shocked, that I need to go buy more JPEGs to calm my nerves. :emot-lol:
7
Star Citizen / Re: Star Citizen Dev Progress Watch
« Last post by N0mad on Today at 03:08:43 AM »
LOL !



Once again CIG have moved (or re-moved) the goalposts. All the new gameplay promised for this year has been replaced with improvements to current systems. The salvage mechanic has survived but been moved into a single feature for next year. Repair and refuel has been reduced in scope to just "manual repair" and "ship to ship refuel" for next year. All other gameplay (and to be honest there wasn't much to get excited about) has been CULLED.

Just to remind you of the original gameplay promises for 3.2:



I'm fully expecting all the core tech improvements to be kicked into the long grass as well.

I can't wait to see where they put Hurston in the PU - my guess will be that it's effectively behind a loading screen and on a different server.
8
Star Citizen / Re: Star Citizen Media Musings
« Last post by dexatron on August 17, 2018, 04:55:54 PM »
I guess the boys at cgmagazine didn't get the news yet...
9
Star Citizen / Re: CryTek v RSI/CIG
« Last post by jwh1701 on August 17, 2018, 04:54:10 PM »
My coverage of the latest SAC filing

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1030420136250040320.html


That was a ton of leg work you did going over the filings, based on everything you showed it seems
Costner getting the last laugh now. I really hope we get open discovery, or at least what Chris promised
which was an "audited accounting".
10
Star Citizen / Re: CryTek v RSI/CIG
« Last post by dsmart on August 17, 2018, 04:52:14 PM »
Just as another thought, in how far would any design work by Crytek during the promotional videos, that CIG still might use, count towards the proclaimed infringement?

None. They pre-date the GLA (a legal contract).

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk